← Default view
YouTube Archiver Comparison — 2026
6 tools reviewed core: yt-dlp ⭐ 169k 95 citations June 2026
Primary Decision

Do you need in-browser playback and full-text search in one app? Or are you feeding content into an existing Plex / Jellyfin / Kodi library?

Standalone watch app · YES path
⭐ 8.1k
3 containers ~4 GB RAM Elasticsearch required Built-in player Full-text search Multi-user auth 1-click cookie

The only tool that is a YouTube-at-home app: Elasticsearch indexes titles, descriptions, subtitles, and comments; the in-browser player tracks watched state; multi-user auth (roles, LDAP). The cost is three containers — app + Redis + Elasticsearch 8 — and the ~4 GB RAM floor is the canonical reason people switch away. [2] [7]

vs
Media server feed · NO path
⭐ 5.0k
1 container SQLite only Richest filter depth Lifecycle hooks Jellyfin / Plex / Kodi No in-app playback

Single-container Elixir app. Best-in-class download filtering: title regex, cutoff date, min/max duration, Shorts/livestream toggles, dry-run preview. Lifecycle scripts (bash/Python, jq bundled) fire on every event. Explicitly "not for consuming content in-app" — it feeds your media server. Front-paged on HN as the rising alternative to TubeArchivist's complexity. [3] [10]

All six tools are wrappers. Every candidate wraps yt-dlp ⭐ 169k — so all break simultaneously when YouTube tightens bot detection. The February 2026 LOGIN_REQUIRED wall hit all of them at once. Plan for monthly yt-dlp updates and, for unattended operation, a co-deployed bgutil POT provider ⭐ 559 to mint proof-of-origin tokens on demand.
Feature Matrix
Tool Type Channel watching Download filters Liked video sync Playback Media server Footprint Health
TubeArchivist ⭐ 8.1k
Full app ✓ once/day cron [8] Shorts/live toggle only [8] ✓ 1-click extension [9] ✓ built-in player Own + Jellyfin plugin
3 containers
~4 GB
Active
PinchFlat ⭐ 5.0k
Manager ✓ interval-based [10] Regex + date + duration [10] ✓ cookies.txt ⚠ ban risk [11] ✗ not for in-app use Jellyfin / Plex / Kodi [20]
1 container
SQLite
Active
TubeSync ⭐ 2.7k
PVR-style ✓ per-source, ≤24h Resolution floor only ✓ Netscape cookies, own risk [24] Plex / Jellyfin
1 container
low
Issues [16]
ytdl-sub ⭐ 2.8k
CLI / YAML ✓ external cron [25] Full yt-dlp YAML config ✓ cookiefile, no auto-prune ✗ no playback NFO presets (Kodi/Jellyfin/Plex)
1 container
low
Active
MeTube ⭐ 13.8k
Queue ✓ 60-min interval (new 2026) [1] Top-50 items only ✓ cookie upload in UI ✗ download-only None (stateless)
1 container
tiny
Active
yt-dlp-web-ui ⭐ 2.5k
Queue ✗ no subscriptions None Manual playlist URL only None
1 container
tiny
Active
GitHub Stars — Popularity vs Archiving Fitness
⭐ 13.8k
⭐ 8.1k
⭐ 5.0k
⭐ 2.8k
⭐ 2.7k
⭐ 2.5k

Stars ≠ archiving fitness. MeTube leads by 70% over TubeArchivist, but it's a download queue with no library or watched-state — most of its stars come from one-off video saving, not channel archiving. TubeArchivist and PinchFlat are purpose-built for the channel-watching + metadata use-case.

Shared Risks — Regardless of Tool Choice
YouTube bot detection breaks all tools at once
All six tools share yt-dlp as the download layer. When YouTube tightens bot detection, every archiver breaks simultaneously — the February 2026 LOGIN_REQUIRED bot wall hit all of them in parallel. Plan for monthly yt-dlp updates. For unattended operation, deploy a bgutil POT provider ⭐ 559 alongside your archiver — it mints proof-of-origin tokens on demand.
🍪
Liked-video sync is universally fragile
Every tool syncs the private LL playlist by feeding yt-dlp a browser cookie. As of 2026: Chrome 127+ app-bound encryption blocks all external cookie readers (Firefox is the only reliable source); cookies expire in roughly two weeks when used outside a browser; a known yt-dlp bug can return only ~11 items from a large liked playlist in one run. Re-exporting Firefox cookies every ~10 days is the irreducible manual step.
Account risk is real, not theoretical
TubeArchivist explicitly warns: "YouTube has a detection mechanism that will invalidate your cookie if it's used outside of a browser." PinchFlat's wiki notes yt-dlp no longer recommends YouTube cookies because they can cause IP bans. TubeSync's cookie docs state it is "entirely at your own risk." Treat the cookie as a Google account credential — not a config value.